Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 2019:metodologia_da_pesquisa [2019/05/31 12:47] – [The Scientific Method] adolfont
+++ 2019:metodologia_da_pesquisa [2020/11/19 11:42] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== Metologia da Pesquisa ======
+====== Metodologia da Pesquisa ======
+  * [[https://cloud.utfpr.edu.br/index.php/s/0VjnyTRqLknaDuw|Artigos e Materiais]]
+  * [[http://moodle.dainf.ct.utfpr.edu.br/course/view.php?id=458|Moodle]]
+  * [[https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/e/2PACX-1vRmdvOX4Yfq-ljovwIp-8uNRTeNsFvET2ePjhG70GxVww0YB1H5mKlFCW2lI7syqg2i9V9iTzSe0YrT/pub|Links e comentários - Metodologia da Pesquisa]]
+    * [[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LoFuJVmudcDeo-81c6yKLBmIDVHRthCDRNudPlPXFlA/edit|Links e comentários - Metodologia da Pesquisa (para edição)]]
+===== Links diversos =====
+[[https://youtu.be/anCSsqqzVzw|Como encontrar o Fator de Impacto no Portal de Periódicos da CAPES]]
 [[Trabalho Focado]]
@@ Line 32: / Line 42: @@
 <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Slides posted! Publish or Perish: Questioning the Impact of Our Research on the Software Developer  <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/icse2019?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#icse2019</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/icse19?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#icse19</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/ICSEconf?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@icseconf</a> <a href="https://t.co/TQ5z7aC2xu">https://t.co/TQ5z7aC2xu</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/SlideShare?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SlideShare</a></p>&mdash; Margaret-Anne Storey (@margaretstorey) <a href="https://twitter.com/margaretstorey/status/1134148675293327360?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2019</a></blockquote>
 <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
+<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I love this msg but (putting my pragmatic/skeptic hat on), I’m also a bit frustrated from hearing it for yrs now w/ no action. If all senior/tenured people (serving on hiring/tenure/program committees) think that way, who exactly is pushing the numbers game 😃 <a href="https://t.co/vlDqrZvvJh">https://t.co/vlDqrZvvJh</a></p>&mdash; Sarah Nadi (@sarahnadi) <a href="https://twitter.com/sarahnadi/status/1134104050981621760?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2019</a></blockquote>
+<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
+See comments too.
+<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/icse19?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#icse19</a> let’s get something straight. “Design Science” is the study of design. The research paradigm where you build and evaluate artifacts is “engineering research”. Don’t borrow stupid, political vocabulary from MIS or other reference disciplines.</p>&mdash; Dr. Paul Ralph (@DrPaulRalph) <a href="https://twitter.com/DrPaulRalph/status/1134173557985021952?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2019</a></blockquote>
+<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 </html>
+===== Reviews =====
+  * PROKNOW-C
+===== Papers =====
+  * [[https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12742|A review of software engineering research from a design science perspective]]
+===== Slides =====
+ * https://speakerdeck.com/robertfeldt/soft-software-engineering-challenges-and-some-hopes-for-the-future?slide=5