blog:the_problems_with_academia
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| blog:the_problems_with_academia [2018/10/15 12:49] – adolfont | blog:the_problems_with_academia [2020/11/19 11:42] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== The problems with Academia ====== | ====== The problems with Academia ====== | ||
| - | Excerpts from Nassim Nicholas Taleb' | + | Excerpts from Nassim Nicholas Taleb' |
| (...) one (now “resigned”) department head one day came to me and emitted the warning: “Just as, when a businessman and author you are judged by other businessmen and authors, here as an academic you are judged by other academics. Life is about peer assessment.” | (...) one (now “resigned”) department head one day came to me and emitted the warning: “Just as, when a businessman and author you are judged by other businessmen and authors, here as an academic you are judged by other academics. Life is about peer assessment.” | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| One should give more weight to research that, while being rigorous, contradicts other peers, particularly if it entails costs and reputational harm for its author. | One should give more weight to research that, while being rigorous, contradicts other peers, particularly if it entails costs and reputational harm for its author. | ||
| - | Someone with a high public presence who is controversial and takes risks for his opinion is less likely to be a bull***t vendor. | + | Someone with a high public presence who is controversial and takes risks for his opinion is less likely to be a bull< |
| **The deprostitutionalization of research will eventually be done as follows. Force people who want to do “research” to do it on their own time, that is, to derive their income from other sources. Sacrifice is necessary.** | **The deprostitutionalization of research will eventually be done as follows. Force people who want to do “research” to do it on their own time, that is, to derive their income from other sources. Sacrifice is necessary.** | ||
| - | For their research to be genuine, **they should first have a real-world day job,** or at least spend ten years as: lens maker, patent clerk, Mafia operator, professional gambler, postman, prison guard, medical doctor, limo driver, militia member, social security agent, trial lawyer, farmer, restaurant chef, high-volume waiter, firefighter (my favorite), lighthouse keeper, etc., while they are building their original ideas. | + | For their research to be genuine, **they should first have a real-world day job, or at least spend ten years as: lens maker, patent clerk, Mafia operator, professional gambler, postman, prison guard, medical doctor, limo driver, militia member, social security agent, trial lawyer, farmer, restaurant chef, high-volume waiter, firefighter (my favorite), lighthouse keeper, etc., while they are building their original ideas.** |
| I have no sympathy for moaning professional researchers. | I have no sympathy for moaning professional researchers. | ||
| - | Remember, science is a minority rule: a few will run it, others are just back-office clerks. | + | Remember, |
| Ideas need to have skin in the game. You know an idea will fail if it is not useful, and can be therefore vulnerable to the falsification of time. | Ideas need to have skin in the game. You know an idea will fail if it is not useful, and can be therefore vulnerable to the falsification of time. | ||
| + | ===== Related Tweets by @nntaleb ===== | ||
| + | The tweets below may disappear at some point in the future as Taleb deletes old tweets. | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
blog/the_problems_with_academia.1539607757.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/11/19 11:42 (external edit)