• Bossavit, Laurent, and Emmanuel Gaillot. "The coder’s dojo–a different way to teach and learn programming." In International Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, pp. 290-291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005.

• Sato, Danilo Toshiaki, Hugo Corbucci, and Mariana Vivian Bravo. "Coding dojo: An environment for learning and sharing agile practices." In Agile, 2008. AGILE'08. Conference, pp. 459-464. IEEE, 2008.

• Da Luz, Ramiro Batista, Adolfo Gustavo Serra Seca Neto, and Robinson Vida Noronha. "Teaching TDD, the coding dojo style." In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on, pp. 371-375. IEEE, 2013.
• Heinonen, Kenny, Kasper Hirvikoski, Matti Luukkainen, and Arto Vihavainen. "Learning agile software engineering practices using coding dojo." In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education, pp. 97-102. ACM, 2013.

• Rocha, Fabio Gomes, Rosimeri Ferraz Sabino, and Guillermo Rodriguez. “Using Dojo as a Pedagogical Practice to Introduce Undergraduate Students to Programming.” "Using Dojo as a Pedagogical Practice to Introduce Undergraduate Students to Programming". CLEI LACLO.

• Ler Scöhn's Reflective Practiotioner books
• Ask for help – the authors of XP2014

• Fazer Coding Dojos em diferentes meetups de programadores aqui na região e até em outras cidades se tiver carro. Comparar entre eles e com outros encontros do mesmo meetup group.
• Lembrar dos Coderetreats
• Fazer o mesmo que o artigo do XP2014 fez com Dojos (classificação descritiva) com Meetups?

• Original
• Sato
• Aniche
• Bravo
• Ramiro 1
• Ramiro 2
• Finland
• XP2014

The Theory and Practice of Randori Coding Dojos, John Rooksby (UGlasgow), Johanna Hunt (Eventyr), Xiaofeng Wang (UBozen-Bolzano).

• Reflective practice

• Set of twelve recordings (screen and voice)
• One of the authors was the facilitator
  • The others were not in attendance.
• Advice from Bossavit and Gaillot
  • Largely pragmatic
• Twelve recordings transcribed in full, 6 independent, 6 dependent
• Hard core of regular attendees
• Selected two sessions (a pair) for in-depth, qualitative analysis
• about 10 people
• 5 minutes
• 12 pairs
• More info on the participants? Stdents? Professionals?

• Pair Testing #CAST2014 http://cast2014.sched.org/event/e3a8b63c6fbc651bc309a3453c0cb5d6#.U9aJlhY-NOE

• https://www.sharelatex.com/project/53dba3ba8ca615b046936815